There are three ways of dealing with a situation/argument.1.Accept the argument as it comes but it won't be possible in many situations. However it may most positive approach in a others view.2.The way of rejection, negative approach most of the time it gives a way to retain our concepts, but may lead to severe argument or disagreement3.Avoid- without proper ending/arguments, it leaves a room to retain our concepts at the same time causing no disagreements but it may irritate the person who you were dealing with.Having used third method most of the times, it is rather difficult to others to understand me, I am not boasting, but sometimes I feel that I could have used second method. Only the problem is it seems to cause some more stress to mind. Actually I should not have any stress. We will go back into 'philosophy'.Theory of escapism can be developed further
Escapism in acceptance: here we accept some facts eventhough We are not ready to follow them.for example when it comes to religion, utter truths people take up this method i.e concepts are accepted by mind not by the heart
Escapism in rejection ; in other words when people wants to make no disagreements or they are not capable to reject
Escapism in escapism : we are not dealing with at all.may be pretend to be dealing. it is far away...
Why am I talking about all these ? I don't know
Escapism in acceptance: here we accept some facts eventhough We are not ready to follow them.for example when it comes to religion, utter truths people take up this method i.e concepts are accepted by mind not by the heart
Escapism in rejection ; in other words when people wants to make no disagreements or they are not capable to reject
Escapism in escapism : we are not dealing with at all.may be pretend to be dealing. it is far away...
Why am I talking about all these ? I don't know
